







Yep, May 4th – 8th is Clinical Trial Awareness Week, and you know how I feel about clinical trials! I have to admit, two years ago I would have said “it’s what week” but then I received the ‘Diagnosis’ and now I am an advocate for clinical trial participation and for the need to bring the patient to the table with the researcher so all of our needs are met. Amazing how life changes isn’t it?
Regular readers are aware that almost every post, no matter the topic, includes a push for you to sign up for the Fox Trial Finder. But then what? You say “OK Tom” and you sign up and you get your first list of trials that match your information and you are excited to find the perfect match that will lead to the cure! But…if you are like me, you discover that you don’t qualify for your first choice because you are already taking Sinemet or Mirapex or some other PD drug. Oh and that is the same problem with your second choice too!
Oh look, a soap box….
I have written about this problem before and it was discussed it at the Rally for the Challenge last year in Grand Rapids and we have discussed it with other PwP’s but we haven’t found an answer to this problem. I may be wrong, but I believe that this issue is a major reason PD researchers can’t recruit enough trial participants. Most of the people I have talked to were diagnosed by completing the toe-heel tapping, finger tapping, nose touching etc. tests AND then, to make sure, prescribed a dopamine replacement drug. Presto, no longer eligible for many trials, at least while in the early progression of PD.
I realize that part of the reason for not taking volunteers who are already medicated is the need to make sure it is the tested drug that produces the expected improvement, not the combination of two or more drugs. But, what if the combination produces a better result? Already many of us take two or more drugs to treat all of our symptoms and improve our quality of life. So here’s my idea..
Why not include some already medicated volunteers in the study design? For example, if you need 400 subjects for Phase III, how about 300 who aren’t taking a dopamine replacement drug (if you can find them) and 50 taking Sinement and 50 taking Mirapex? It might require some tweaking of the dosage of the drugs but you have another 100 participants in your trial. Just a thought, we need clinical trials and they need volunteers, so it’s time to stop saying ‘That’s the way we have always done it” and time to be innovative and try something new.
…..OK, off the soapbox.


We arrived early to help with the setup for the walk and I was glad my stepson, Darrin, joined us for the heavy lifting! This was also our first ‘gig’ as Fox Trial Finder Ambassadors and we set up a table to promote Fox Trial Finder and Fox InSight. We had a lot of activity at our table, handed out a lot of information and MJFF orange brain shaped stress relievers. We met a lot of new people who were interested in both programs and hopefully our efforts result in some new sign ups.
We were asked to speak during the prerace ceremonies so, in addition to our first Trial Finder gig, I made my first presentation about current research and the need for participating in Fox Trial Finder and Fox InSight. I had prepared some notes (about 7 pages when printed in large type!) but found it hard to read the notes, maintain some eye contact, speak loudly AND hold the microphone at the same time so it was more of an ‘off the cuff’ speech it but it seemed to go OK for a first attempt.
Yep, May 4th – 8th is Clinical Trial Awareness Week, and you know how I feel about clinical trials! I have to admit, two years ago I would have said “it’s what week” but then I received the ‘Diagnosis’ and now I am an advocate for clinical trial participation and for the need to bring the patient to the table with the researcher so all of our needs are met. Amazing how life changes isn’t it?
Regular readers are aware that almost every post, no matter the topic, includes a push for you to sign up for the Fox Trial Finder. But then what? You say “OK Tom” and you sign up and you get your first list of trials that match your information and you are excited to find the perfect match that will lead to the cure! But…if you are like me, you discover that you don’t qualify for your first choice because you are already taking Sinemet or Mirapex or some other PD drug. Oh and that is the same problem with your second choice too!
Oh look, a soap box….
I have written about this problem before and it was discussed it at the Rally for the Challenge last year in Grand Rapids and we have discussed it with other PwP’s but we haven’t found an answer to this problem. I may be wrong, but I believe that this issue is a major reason PD researchers can’t recruit enough trial participants. Most of the people I have talked to were diagnosed by completing the toe-heel tapping, finger tapping, nose touching etc. tests AND then, to make sure, prescribed a dopamine replacement drug. Presto, no longer eligible for many trials, at least while in the early progression of PD.
I realize that part of the reason for not taking volunteers who are already medicated is the need to make sure it is the tested drug that produces the expected improvement, not the combination of two or more drugs. But, what if the combination produces a better result? Already many of us take two or more drugs to treat all of our symptoms and improve our quality of life. So here’s my idea..
Why not include some already medicated volunteers in the study design? For example, if you need 400 subjects for Phase III, how about 300 who aren’t taking a dopamine replacement drug (if you can find them) and 50 taking Sinement and 50 taking Mirapex? It might require some tweaking of the dosage of the drugs but you have another 100 participants in your trial. Just a thought, we need clinical trials and they need volunteers, so it’s time to stop saying ‘That’s the way we have always done it” and time to be innovative and try something new.
…..OK, off the soapbox.
Yep, May 4th – 8th is Clinical Trial Awareness Week, and you know how I feel about clinical trials! I have to admit, two years ago I would have said “it’s what week” but then I received the ‘Diagnosis’ and now I am an advocate for clinical trial participation and for the need to bring the patient to the table with the researcher so all of our needs are met. Amazing how life changes isn’t it?
Regular readers are aware that almost every post, no matter the topic, includes a push for you to sign up for the Fox Trial Finder. But then what? You say “OK Tom” and you sign up and you get your first list of trials that match your information and you are excited to find the perfect match that will lead to the cure! But…if you are like me, you discover that you don’t qualify for your first choice because you are already taking Sinemet or Mirapex or some other PD drug. Oh and that is the same problem with your second choice too!
Oh look, a soap box….
I have written about this problem before and it was discussed it at the Rally for the Challenge last year in Grand Rapids and we have discussed it with other PwP’s but we haven’t found an answer to this problem. I may be wrong, but I believe that this issue is a major reason PD researchers can’t recruit enough trial participants. Most of the people I have talked to were diagnosed by completing the toe-heel tapping, finger tapping, nose touching etc. tests AND then, to make sure, prescribed a dopamine replacement drug. Presto, no longer eligible for many trials, at least while in the early progression of PD.
I realize that part of the reason for not taking volunteers who are already medicated is the need to make sure it is the tested drug that produces the expected improvement, not the combination of two or more drugs. But, what if the combination produces a better result? Already many of us take two or more drugs to treat all of our symptoms and improve our quality of life. So here’s my idea..
Why not include some already medicated volunteers in the study design? For example, if you need 400 subjects for Phase III, how about 300 who aren’t taking a dopamine replacement drug (if you can find them) and 50 taking Sinement and 50 taking Mirapex? It might require some tweaking of the dosage of the drugs but you have another 100 participants in your trial. Just a thought, we need clinical trials and they need volunteers, so it’s time to stop saying ‘That’s the way we have always done it” and time to be innovative and try something new.
…..OK, off the soapbox.
Yep, May 4th – 8th is Clinical Trial Awareness Week, and you know how I feel about clinical trials! I have to admit, two years ago I would have said “it’s what week” but then I received the ‘Diagnosis’ and now I am an advocate for clinical trial participation and for the need to bring the patient to the table with the researcher so all of our needs are met. Amazing how life changes isn’t it?
Regular readers are aware that almost every post, no matter the topic, includes a push for you to sign up for the Fox Trial Finder. But then what? You say “OK Tom” and you sign up and you get your first list of trials that match your information and you are excited to find the perfect match that will lead to the cure! But…if you are like me, you discover that you don’t qualify for your first choice because you are already taking Sinemet or Mirapex or some other PD drug. Oh and that is the same problem with your second choice too!
Oh look, a soap box….
I have written about this problem before and it was discussed it at the Rally for the Challenge last year in Grand Rapids and we have discussed it with other PwP’s but we haven’t found an answer to this problem. I may be wrong, but I believe that this issue is a major reason PD researchers can’t recruit enough trial participants. Most of the people I have talked to were diagnosed by completing the toe-heel tapping, finger tapping, nose touching etc. tests AND then, to make sure, prescribed a dopamine replacement drug. Presto, no longer eligible for many trials, at least while in the early progression of PD.
I realize that part of the reason for not taking volunteers who are already medicated is the need to make sure it is the tested drug that produces the expected improvement, not the combination of two or more drugs. But, what if the combination produces a better result? Already many of us take two or more drugs to treat all of our symptoms and improve our quality of life. So here’s my idea..
Why not include some already medicated volunteers in the study design? For example, if you need 400 subjects for Phase III, how about 300 who aren’t taking a dopamine replacement drug (if you can find them) and 50 taking Sinement and 50 taking Mirapex? It might require some tweaking of the dosage of the drugs but you have another 100 participants in your trial. Just a thought, we need clinical trials and they need volunteers, so it’s time to stop saying ‘That’s the way we have always done it” and time to be innovative and try something new.
…..OK, off the soapbox.

It’s been a busy couple of weeks and I know everyone is waiting for an update from the beach 🙂 As I mentioned in the last post we were planning a Kripalu mini-reunion with Joel and Melisa and Marcia and Erwin and we were able to get together for lunch and then a nice visit while sitting on the beach. As Marcia said later, “..it felt like connecting with very close family.” We all caught up on what has happened since October 2013 which, of course, included what medications we were taking, comparing notes on doctor visits, etc. Marcia and Erwin along with another couple from our Kripalu visit are staging the first Pocono FoxTrot 5K for Parkinson’s with the proceeds going to the Michael J Fox Foundation. If you are going to be in the Pocono’s area June 20th, you can sign up for the 5K run/walk, the 1 mile community walk or the Kids 1 mile run/walk at this link.
A few days later, we attended our second Parkinson’s Cafe event, a backstage tour of the Sarasota Ballet. This tour included a chance to watch the ballet master conduct training for about 30 cast members and students which was fascinating, they just flew across the room executing jumps and turns like they had wings!After the tour, we participated in a PD in Motion class, a dance/exercise class for PD patients which is conducted every week by the Neuro Challenge Foundation here in Sarasota. The program was started in NYC and has expanded nationwide. As you can see, most of the exercises were done sitting down and involved moving legs, arms, and torso. We really enjoyed it and we attended the next class and will catch a couple more before we leave the beach.
And this week we attended a choral singing class, also sponsored by the Neuro Challenge Foundation. Called the Off Key Choir about 45-50 of us sang some Irish tunes since it was St Patrick’s day, and, by the end we did it in 4 part harmony! This was a great way to learn breathing and speech techniques to help with the soft voice of PwP. It was great fun and we are happy Merrily and Robert Manthey told us about it and invited us to attend.
